Age range
7–16
Time
Format
Who runs it
What you get
What it measures
Executive function
Tasks:
Focus
Executive function
Tasks:
Focus
Left or right
Executive function
Tasks:
Colours & Shapes
Executive function
Tasks:
Block move
Executive function
Tasks:
Word memory
Memory
Context
Tasks:
Shape search
Numbers
What your pupils will do
Introduction video
Spoken instructions
Practice with feedback
Resume later
How a session starts
1
Pupils type their own 8‑character Login ID
2
They press Start when they’re ready
3
They choose Focus, the name pupils see for this assessment
Task by task
Each card shows the name pupils see, the task’s formal name and the skill it measures. The first task is also called Focus, the name pupils see for the whole assessment.
Planning your first session?
Talk it through with our team, or send us a question about devices and set‑up.
What you get
Inside an Executive Function report
Use the arrows to look through four parts of the sample report of Arthur Brown, a fictional secondary pupil.
1
Insights
His level of need and executive function result, each explained in a few plain sentences.
2
Results
His scores in six areas on one chart, compared with pupils of the same age.
3
Scores
Each standard score with its score rank, percentile rank and 95% confidence interval.
4
How to support
Practical next steps matched to his profile and year group. Use the tabs to switch between the classroom, extra support and home.
See Arthur’s full report (PDF)
No challenges
Challenges
Inconclusive
Inconclusive never means no challenges. A retest is recommended.
Low
Medium
High
Very high
Built into every report
Checked by a person
Every report is reviewed by Talamo before release, normally within 48 hours.
Unusual results flagged
A score far outside the typical range prompts a review, not a verdict. Check supervision, access needs and device issues before arranging a retest.
Pupil data kept private
The AI that drafts the written explanation in each report sees pseudonymised scores and context only, never a pupil’s name or other identifying details. Pupil data is stored in the UK.

pupils aged 7 to 16, in 13 schools across England, make up the current norms (spring 2026).
reliability for the ten task measures tested so far (1.0 would mean perfectly consistent), from the pilot study.
of pupils in the standardisation study were flagged for challenges. The threshold was set with the expected rate of marked difficulty in mind.
Built on established tasks
Digital versions of extensively researched tasks, including the Sustained Attention to Response Task, the Eriksen flanker task, rule-switching and tower planning. Numbers Reversed and Verbal Attention are adapted from the Woodcock-Johnson IV, developed in partnership with its publisher, Riverside Insights.
Refined on pilot evidence
Nine tasks were piloted with 238 pupils in 14 schools between January and March 2026. Two were replaced on that evidence: Flanker, for example, replaced a Stroop task whose response times varied too much to interpret. A task keeps its place only while the data supports it.
Good to know
Does this assessment diagnose attention difficulties?
Does a reported diagnosis change the result?
Are results as reliable for younger pupils?
What should we do if a pupil is flagged?

Talk to our team
Arthur’s report
Sample report · Executive Function
Working memory
Low
Inhibitory control
Average
Planning
Below average
Book a call
With our team






























